Skip to main content

H&G All-Time Index public fighter card

Tiger Flowers

Middleweight · United States

Tiger Flowers ranks #192 in the H&G All-Time Index at Middleweight, with a 80.66 All-Time Index score and a 117-16-8 professional record. His career span on this page is 1920-1927.

All-time rank
#192
H&G All-Time Index
80.660-100 ranking index. This is the number that orders the list.
Career record
117-16-8Professional wins, losses and draws.
Active years
1920-1927
Data Confidence
HighDeep career evidence and a tighter peak-rating band in this release. Close ranks still need boxing judgement.

Career story

How Tiger Flowers's rating rose and fell year by year, with his peak marked.

Career arc

Yearly peak-form Elo rating points. This curve is separate from the 0-100 ranking index.

Show the year-by-year numbers
Tiger Flowers yearly peak-form Elo rating points
YearPeak-form Elo rating
19201,537
19211,564
19221,625
19231,706
19241,789
19251,827
19261,841
19271,848

Why this ranking

Tiger Flowers ranks #192 with a 80.66 score on the 60-100 H&G All-Time Index. His standout win in our data is over Harry Greb in 1926, who reached a 2,047 Peak-form Elo, one of the stronger opponents on his record. He also fought Lee Anderson 7 times, going 7-0-0 across that series. Our fight-by-fight records do not add up to his full public win-loss-draw total, so the head-to-head details here are a partial picture. Peak-form Elo is 1,848 (±170), separate from the 60-100 career Index.

What lifts or lowers this ranking

Bars show each weighted signal's relative size. Gold lifts the placement; grey holds it back.

Cross-era separationAbove the typical top-1000 fighter

Same-era separation left after the shared peak and sustained rating signal is removed.

Major title-control signalAbove the typical top-1000 fighter

A narrow signal for lineal, explicit undisputed or major multi-belt class control in this release data; it is not a full title history.

Elite winsAbove the typical top-1000 fighter

How much the record is helped by wins over contemporaneous title-level opponents.

Top-level longevityAround the typical top-1000 fighter

How much repeat elite-year presence supports the all-time case.

World-title recordAround the typical top-1000 fighter

How much major title evidence supports the rating.

Career rating profileAround the typical top-1000 fighter

Collapsed signal from peak rating, sustained rating and same-era separation.

Compare and explore

Put Tiger Flowers next to any other ranked fighter, or open the tools built on the same rating data.

Top fights

The highest-ranked fighters Tiger Flowers actually faced, biggest names first. Each one opens the head-to-head tool with the pair filled in.

Show 1 more

Ranked-vs-ranked bouts from the pinned fight archive, ordered by opponent ranking. An objective record of who they shared a ring with.

Great rivals he never fought

Ranked fighters who shared a recognised division and whose competitive careers overlapped, with no bout between them on record. Each name opens the head-to-head tool with the pair filled in.

  • Jack Dempsey#33 · Light Heavyweight · 5 overlapping years (1923-1927)
  • Gene Tunney#44 · Light Heavyweight · 5 overlapping years (1923-1927)
  • Ted Kid Lewis#91 · Middleweight / Light Heavyweight · 5 overlapping years (1923-1927)
  • Jimmy Slattery#262 · Middleweight / Light Heavyweight · 5 overlapping years (1923-1927)
  • Dave Shade#335 · Middleweight · 4 overlapping years (1924-1927)
  • Jeff Smith#458 · Middleweight · 5 overlapping years (1923-1927)
Show 2 more

Shared recognised division, overlapping competitive years, no recorded bout between them. A measured pattern only.

About this rating

Rankings: H&G All-Time Index v2.0.0. Reflects fights up to , the most recent on record. The ratings are fixed to that point, so fights after it are not yet included.

The rating itself is built from the 116 bouts we hold full data for from 1923 to 1927, which is why this count differs from the professional record above.

For the data-minded

Peak-form Elo rating: 1,848 (peak dated 1927-09-30). This best-point rating sits on its own scale and is not directly comparable with the 0-100 index.

The peak estimate carries an uncertainty band of about ±170 Elo, so read close comparisons with care.

WEB DESIGN BY JF
Call Us Free Trial