H&G All-Time Index public fighter card
Agit Kabayel
Heavyweight · Germany
Agit Kabayel ranks #806 in the H&G All-Time Index at Heavyweight, with a 72.31 All-Time Index score and a 27-0-0 professional record. His career span on this page is 2011-2026.
- All-time rank
- #806
- H&G All-Time Index
- 72.310-100 ranking index. This is the number that orders the list.
- Career record
- 27-0-0Professional wins, losses and draws.
- Active years
- 2011-2026
- Data Confidence
- LowLimited or wide-band career evidence. Treat close ranks as provisional.
Career highlights
Career story
How Agit Kabayel's rating rose and fell year by year, with his peak marked.
Yearly peak-form Elo rating points. This curve is separate from the 0-100 ranking index.
Show the year-by-year numbers
| Year | Peak-form Elo rating |
|---|---|
| 2013 | 1,788 |
| 2014 | 1,825 |
| 2015 | 1,861 |
| 2016 | 1,878 |
| 2017 | 1,916 |
| 2018 | 1,923 |
| 2019 | 1,936 |
| 2020 | 1,955 |
| 2021 | 1,969 |
| 2022 | 1,984 |
| 2023 | 2,015 |
| 2024 | 2,020 |
| 2025 | 2,024 |
| 2026 | 2,026 |
Why this ranking
Agit Kabayel ranks #806 with a 72.31 score on the 60-100 H&G All-Time Index. His public win-loss-draw record shows no defeats, so there are no losses to add context to here. He has wins over 4 opponents who were unbeaten at the time. Holding the score back, quality of opponents beaten sits below the field of ranked fighters in this release. Data Confidence is Low, so the rating should be read with wider uncertainty. Peak-form Elo is 2,026 (±312), separate from the 60-100 career Index.
What lifts or lowers this ranking
Bars show each weighted signal's relative size. Gold lifts the placement; grey holds it back.
Collapsed signal from peak rating, sustained rating and same-era separation.
Same-era separation left after the shared peak and sustained rating signal is removed.
How much repeat elite-year presence supports the all-time case.
A narrow signal for lineal, explicit undisputed or major multi-belt class control in this release data; it is not a full title history.
How much major title evidence supports the rating.
How much the record is helped by wins over contemporaneous title-level opponents.
Compare and explore
Put Agit Kabayel next to any other ranked fighter, or open the tools built on the same rating data.
Great rivals he never fought
Ranked fighters who shared a recognised division and whose competitive careers overlapped, with no bout between them on record. Each name opens the head-to-head tool with the pair filled in.
- Oleksandr Usyk#10 · Heavyweight · 13 overlapping years (2013-2025)
- Tyson Fury#82 · Heavyweight · 16 overlapping years (2011-2026)
- Alexander Povetkin#163 · Heavyweight · 11 overlapping years (2011-2021)
- Deontay Wilder#171 · Heavyweight · 16 overlapping years (2011-2026)
- Anthony Joshua#183 · Heavyweight · 13 overlapping years (2013-2025)
- Tomasz Adamek#238 · Heavyweight · 8 overlapping years (2011-2018)
Show 6 more
- Lawrence Okolie#343 · Heavyweight · 9 overlapping years (2017-2025)
- Daniel Dubois#359 · Heavyweight · 9 overlapping years (2017-2025)
- Joseph Parker#381 · Heavyweight · 14 overlapping years (2012-2025)
- David Haye#406 · Heavyweight · 8 overlapping years (2011-2018)
- Murat Gassiev#431 · Heavyweight · 15 overlapping years (2011-2025)
- Steve Cunningham#446 · Heavyweight · 11 overlapping years (2011-2021)
Shared recognised division, overlapping competitive years, no recorded bout between them. A measured pattern only.
Linked style profile
8-axis style breakdown
Agit Kabayel also has a reviewed style profile with radar scores, study notes and diagnostic comparisons.
About this rating
Rankings: H&G All-Time Index v2.0.0. Reflects fights up to , the most recent on record. The ratings are fixed to that point, so fights after it are not yet included.
The rating itself is built from the 22 bouts we hold full data for from 2011 to 2026, which is why this count differs from the professional record above.
For the data-minded
Peak-form Elo rating: 2,026 (peak dated 2026-01-01). This best-point rating sits on its own scale and is not directly comparable with the 0-100 index.
The peak estimate carries an uncertainty band of about ±312 Elo, so read close comparisons with care.