H&G All-Time Index public fighter card
Pete Herman
Bantamweight · United States
Pete Herman ranks #604 in the H&G All-Time Index at Bantamweight, with a 74.07 All-Time Index score and a 60-13-9 professional record. His career span on this page is 1912-1922.
- All-time rank
- #604
- H&G All-Time Index
- 74.070-100 ranking index. This is the number that orders the list.
- Career record
- 60-13-9Professional wins, losses and draws.
- Active years
- 1912-1922
- Data Confidence
- HighDeep career evidence and a tighter peak-rating band in this release. Close ranks still need boxing judgement.
Career story
How Pete Herman's rating rose and fell year by year, with his peak marked.
Yearly peak-form Elo rating points. This curve is separate from the 0-100 ranking index.
Show the year-by-year numbers
| Year | Peak-form Elo rating |
|---|---|
| 1912 | 1,590 |
| 1913 | 1,621 |
| 1914 | 1,642 |
| 1915 | 1,654 |
| 1916 | 1,686 |
| 1917 | 1,693 |
| 1918 | 1,627 |
| 1919 | 1,560 |
| 1920 | 1,559 |
| 1921 | 1,563 |
| 1922 | 1,565 |
Why this ranking
Pete Herman ranks #604 with a 74.07 score on the 60-100 H&G All-Time Index. His standout win in our data is over Jimmy Wilde in 1921, who reached a 1,802 Peak-form Elo, one of the stronger opponents on his record. In 5 cases a result was later reversed, including Sammy Sandow, whom he beat once but lost to in a later fight. Holding the score back, sustained head-to-head rating level sits below the field of ranked fighters in this release. Our fight-by-fight records do not add up to his full public win-loss-draw total, so the head-to-head details here are a partial picture. Peak-form Elo is 1,693 (±131), separate from the 60-100 career Index.
What lifts or lowers this ranking
Bars show each weighted signal's relative size. Gold lifts the placement; grey holds it back.
How much the record is helped by wins over contemporaneous title-level opponents.
A narrow signal for lineal, explicit undisputed or major multi-belt class control in this release data; it is not a full title history.
How much major title evidence supports the rating.
How much repeat elite-year presence supports the all-time case.
Same-era separation left after the shared peak and sustained rating signal is removed.
Collapsed signal from peak rating, sustained rating and same-era separation.
Compare and explore
Put Pete Herman next to any other ranked fighter, or open the tools built on the same rating data.
Top fights
The highest-ranked fighters Pete Herman actually faced, biggest names first. Each one opens the head-to-head tool with the pair filled in.
- Jimmy Wilde#90 · Index 84 · 1921
- Lew Tendler#230 · Index 79 · 1916
- Kid Williams#312 · Index 78 · 1916, 1917
- Johnny Coulon#474 · Index 76 · 1917
- Eddie Campi#520 · Index 75 · 1914
Ranked-vs-ranked bouts from the pinned fight archive, ordered by opponent ranking. An objective record of who they shared a ring with.
Great rivals he never fought
Ranked fighters who shared a recognised division and whose competitive careers overlapped, with no bout between them on record. Each name opens the head-to-head tool with the pair filled in.
- Johnny Kilbane#199 · Featherweight · 8 overlapping years (1915-1922)
- Pancho Villa#204 · Bantamweight · 4 overlapping years (1919-1922)
Shared recognised division, overlapping competitive years, no recorded bout between them. A measured pattern only.
Linked style profile
8-axis style breakdown
Pete Herman also has a reviewed style profile with radar scores, study notes and diagnostic comparisons.
About this rating
Rankings: H&G All-Time Index v2.0.0. Reflects fights up to , the most recent on record. The ratings are fixed to that point, so fights after it are not yet included.
The rating itself is built from the 106 bouts we hold full data for from 1915 to 1922, which is why this count differs from the professional record above.
For the data-minded
Peak-form Elo rating: 1,693 (peak dated 1917-03-13). This best-point rating sits on its own scale and is not directly comparable with the 0-100 index.
The peak estimate carries an uncertainty band of about ±131 Elo, so read close comparisons with care.